Thanks again Dr. John, have followed you on YT for almost the over 2 years and learned so much. Glad to see you on this platform. Your righteous but muted anger in the face of these lies is a testament to your English upbringing.
So we have a one in twenty SAE and a 0.9% death rate for SAEs. If I'm looking at that right, roughly 1 in 200 people who got the first doses died from them? We're edging towards being able to factually say this program killed more people than it saved. Which would make it one of the worst man-made disasters in history.
Two comments 1 I can see why the editors rejected the papers. For the plot, the time dependency has to be made explicit, for every data point. Otherwise, the coloring and lines appear arbitrary. 2 Assuming that the groupings are representing a kind of time sequence or each group represents a different time period, The graph represents classic manufacturing learning. As has been reported elsewhere, I think the pharma substack, the lots in this paper were made by Moderns, not Pfizer. The operators in the plants and suppliers were inexperienced and the really had, according to the European health agency in charge, no standards SOPs and quality metrics, or pharmakinectics to guide them. All your speculation in the videos isn't on the mark. Id do the paper using 4 D Bayesian analysis, which should clarify what the data show. Can I get the data from someone?
Next obvious thing is to look for patterns in the dots - I get that the colours and lines are just trying to fit groups together, but was it a learning thing (did all the 'blue' dots come in early batches) or a management thing (did all the blue dots come from specific countries or factories) ? The next level of analysis would be great.
Is there a list of the breakdown of SAE’s? I think many people have no idea what is linked to the mRNA’s. And still no studies on reproductive /menstrual or issues in women and why it messed with their periods so much.
apart from pfizer 3000 plus pages. I think a few have been listed in yellow card from the UK govt site, I havent looked at it for a year , its horrific
John foĺlowed you for a few years. I trusted a lot of what you said but I felt you were a shill when you went down the take the vaccine path. You use the word safe so you are still not there. Bioweapon depopulation by design. Our governments are trying to kill us. Until you understand you are a useful idiot. Sorry mate. Bye
Harsh, Man. Too harsh. John trusted our health authorities at first like a whole lot of folks. He discovered lots of things along the way like we all did. And he is not the idiot.
It's hard not to feel that way. Here's the thing: in the time between the declaration of the pandemic and the roll-out of the "vaccines", many people decided to read up on immunology of respiratory infections and had very solid reasons to distrust the statements of the authorities. These shots and no intramuscular shots for that matter are capable of inducing meaningful mucosal immunity so the claims made by PHE were bogus to begin with. Now add to that early warnings regarding the mechanism of action of mRNA transfections when they came out (by Bhakdi) and one realizes the trust should never have been there in the first place.
He was honest about his mistake - unlike everyone in government. And he's openly published his journey, and - incredibly - managed to skirt around YouTube censorship while he did it. Huge respect for him, from me anyway.
Is not the JAB ( Covid-19 Shot ) still under an EUA ( emergency use authorization ) by the CDC ?
And if so why ? Is something wrong with it ? Like the fear of the manufacturers getting their rear ends sued and thus clotting the courts with massive litigation world wide.
Thanks again Dr. John, have followed you on YT for almost the over 2 years and learned so much. Glad to see you on this platform. Your righteous but muted anger in the face of these lies is a testament to your English upbringing.
Your efforts and role as a collector and disseminator of validated information is much appreciated.
The current climate of our respective governments leaves individuals doubtful of the accuracy and completeness of Bureaucracy speakers.
So we have a one in twenty SAE and a 0.9% death rate for SAEs. If I'm looking at that right, roughly 1 in 200 people who got the first doses died from them? We're edging towards being able to factually say this program killed more people than it saved. Which would make it one of the worst man-made disasters in history.
Two comments 1 I can see why the editors rejected the papers. For the plot, the time dependency has to be made explicit, for every data point. Otherwise, the coloring and lines appear arbitrary. 2 Assuming that the groupings are representing a kind of time sequence or each group represents a different time period, The graph represents classic manufacturing learning. As has been reported elsewhere, I think the pharma substack, the lots in this paper were made by Moderns, not Pfizer. The operators in the plants and suppliers were inexperienced and the really had, according to the European health agency in charge, no standards SOPs and quality metrics, or pharmakinectics to guide them. All your speculation in the videos isn't on the mark. Id do the paper using 4 D Bayesian analysis, which should clarify what the data show. Can I get the data from someone?
Next obvious thing is to look for patterns in the dots - I get that the colours and lines are just trying to fit groups together, but was it a learning thing (did all the 'blue' dots come in early batches) or a management thing (did all the blue dots come from specific countries or factories) ? The next level of analysis would be great.
So even the less dangerous batches still way too dangerous. It’s a humanitarian tragedy.
Great work John, thank you for disseminating the real truth on this troubling matter. Bravo!
.
Dear Jamie Fox,
We Know You Are Being Held Hostage
But We Are Going To Need Proof Of Life
Before We Can Pretend To Give A Shit.
- You Made Your Bed.
.
High stakes
Low reward
Bad ideas
Rest assured
Chaos and conundrum
People falling down
One day they're up laughing
The next they're underground
Is there a list of the breakdown of SAE’s? I think many people have no idea what is linked to the mRNA’s. And still no studies on reproductive /menstrual or issues in women and why it messed with their periods so much.
apart from pfizer 3000 plus pages. I think a few have been listed in yellow card from the UK govt site, I havent looked at it for a year , its horrific
John foĺlowed you for a few years. I trusted a lot of what you said but I felt you were a shill when you went down the take the vaccine path. You use the word safe so you are still not there. Bioweapon depopulation by design. Our governments are trying to kill us. Until you understand you are a useful idiot. Sorry mate. Bye
Harsh, Man. Too harsh. John trusted our health authorities at first like a whole lot of folks. He discovered lots of things along the way like we all did. And he is not the idiot.
It's hard not to feel that way. Here's the thing: in the time between the declaration of the pandemic and the roll-out of the "vaccines", many people decided to read up on immunology of respiratory infections and had very solid reasons to distrust the statements of the authorities. These shots and no intramuscular shots for that matter are capable of inducing meaningful mucosal immunity so the claims made by PHE were bogus to begin with. Now add to that early warnings regarding the mechanism of action of mRNA transfections when they came out (by Bhakdi) and one realizes the trust should never have been there in the first place.
SITting on the fence so long gave him splinters up his bum. Still, £1M off his channel not bad.
He was honest about his mistake - unlike everyone in government. And he's openly published his journey, and - incredibly - managed to skirt around YouTube censorship while he did it. Huge respect for him, from me anyway.
I don't hate him. I know he treads a fine line but still, how many people got injured or killed trusting his earluer position?
Can I suggest another variable? In my post (which did quite well) I released new data showing that the MHRA in the UK are probably not releasing all of their injury reports. Link below. How reliable is the regulator in Denmark? https://open.substack.com/pub/feldmans/p/are-the-mhra-releasing-all-of-their?r=xwknv&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
howbadismybatch.com
Saw your video on self assembly artifacts. Now no longer available on YouTube. Will you be putting it up here?
Is not the JAB ( Covid-19 Shot ) still under an EUA ( emergency use authorization ) by the CDC ?
And if so why ? Is something wrong with it ? Like the fear of the manufacturers getting their rear ends sued and thus clotting the courts with massive litigation world wide.
The authorities are playing Russian roulette.